Twenty-one international news editors have
signed
on to a letter to the
Pakistan
government today. It was addressed to
Minister
for Information and Broadcasting Qamar Zaman Kaira and was drafted by
Islamabad’s foreign
correspondent community
.
They were concerned about an article that appeared in
Pakistan’s
The
Nation daily on November 5 accusing
Wall Street Journal reporter Matthew
Rosenberg of working for the CIA, Israeli intelligence, and the
U.S. military
contractor Blackwater (now known as Xe).
Journal Managing
Editor Robert Thomson wrote to The Nation’s editor, Shireen Mazari soon
after the article had appeared. Thomson said he was disgusted with the story, calling
it baseless and false. CPJ
wrote about The Nation’s article, too.
We called it “playing the spy card” because we have seen this tactic used in
other places. It poisons the atmosphere for all journalists, no matter who
their employer or where they come from.
The Islamabad foreign correspondents wanted the
letter to be signed by top supervisors at their headquarters because this is a
safety issue of paramount importance. As one commenter said recently on the CPJ
Blog: “Such a baseless story not only put at risk the life of a foreign
journalist but [those] of the local interpreters/fixers/translators who are
working with these journalists.” It was not lost on anyone that the Journal’s Daniel Pearl, kidnapped and
killed in 2002, was labeled a spy by his captors.
Today’s letter says, in
part, “We strongly support press freedoms across the world. But
this irresponsible article endangered the life of one journalist and could
imperil others. It is particularly upsetting that this threat has come from
among our own colleagues.”
And
the broader threat is that, if such a tactic is successful in driving one
reporter out of the country, why not use it to target more of them? It’s fair to say The Nation represents a strong
nationalist position within Pakistan’s
political spectrum, a position that grows more widely accepted as violence
increases. There have been a
few articles supportive of the Nation’s
piece and critical of foreign media coverage of Pakistan.
That the threats could spread
concerns foreign reporters. “We ask the government of Pakistan to
take note of this story and to take all necessary steps to ensure the safety of
all media personnel in the future,” the letter says.
I
reported extensively on the threats to the Pakistani press in Swat and
Mingora after meeting with more than 30 journalists in Islamabad
and Peshawar in
July. Many were threatened and harassed by all sides to the conflict—the
military, the insurgents, the criminals who fill the social vacuum when war
sweeps away the veneer of civility and leaves fear to rule. Pakistani
journalists have worked too hard and have stood up to too many people who
wanted to silence them to allow the country to sink into a swirl of unfounded
accusations, launched with the aim of intimidation and silence.
The story by the Nation is a sinister effort at instigating certain elements against a journalist who is simply performing his duty to inform people. The story specifically and clearly targets Mathew Rosenberg. The fact that Mathew's surname indicates his religious background makes it abundantly clear the mal-intention behind the story. The editors of the paper and their behind-the-scenes feeders want him and other such journalists to back off from the so-called war torn areas or, as seems to be the hidden message, they may meet the same fate as Daniel Pearl. Even if Shirin Mazari's stance that the area, where Mathew dared to tread, is forbidden for journalists under some notification or law of the land is untenable legally, constitutionally, morally as well as on the touchstone of ethics of journalism. No law whatsoever can take away the constitutional, legal and human right of the people to be informed, even if we for the sake of argument we admit that there is any such law in existence. Conversely, journalists are morally and ethically bound to inform and provide truthful account. And this duty transcends national boundaries. Mathew Rosenberg was simply performing his duty, targeting him in such a manner can not be a job done by honest journalists. We must all stand by Mathew and other such journalists who put their lives at risk for truth to be told.
Asad Jamal
Advocate