Singapore: CPJ condemns ban on Far Eastern Economic Review
October 2, 2006 12:00 PM ET
New York, October 2, 2006—The Committee to Protect Journalists today condemned a ban on the Far Eastern Economic Review, which has been hit with a criminal defamation lawsuit by the Singapore leadership for an article about an opposition politician.
The Ministry of Information, Communications and Arts revoked the Review’s distribution rights in Singapore on September 28 after the Hong Kong-based monthly failed to appoint a legal representative and post a S$200,000 (US$126,000) security bond, as required by regulations covering foreign publications announced in August.
That month, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and his father and veteran leader, Lee Kuan Yew, brought a criminal libel suit against the Review’s publisher and editor over a critical article in July about opposition politician Chee Soon Juan. See CPJ’s September 14 alert.
“Singapore’s ban on the Far Eastern Economic Review is nothing but retaliation for critical news coverage,” said Joel Simon, CPJ’s executive director. “Singapore’s leaders should not resort to such an outdated and undemocratic tool as criminal defamation. We call on the authorities to lift the ban on the Review, drop their defamation prosecution, and allow all international publications to be distributed.”
The city-state’s political leadership has frequently resorted to the courts to silence political opponents, often bankrupting them through damages and legal fees. Since the 1980s, they have filed or threatened to file lawsuits against the Review, the International Herald Tribune, TheEconomist, Business Week, and Bloomberg, among others. Under the Lees, no foreign publication has ever won a government-ordered libel suit that has been heard in Singapore’s courts.
An information ministry official told journalists after announcing the ban on the Review that the distribution of foreign publications in Singapore was a “privilege not a right.”
The new regulations were part of tighter restrictions imposed on offshore newspapers by the government in August. Among those targeted in addition to the Review, were Newsweek, Time, the Financial Times and the International Herald Tribune. These publications are still on sale in Singapore but it is not clear whether they have complied with the new requirements.
"These retroactive regulations furthered the interests of individual members of the government and harmed the magazine financially, but were never justified by the government under the applicable law," the Review said in a statement. "We regret that this action infringes on the fundamental rights of our Singaporean subscribers and further restricts the already narrow scope of free expression in Singapore," the statement said. The Review said it will respond more fully to the situation in its next edition, which will be released on October 6. The Review’s online subscription service is still available in Singapore.
Singapore passes 'fake news' legislation that threatens press
May 9, 2019 10:23 AM ET
Bangkok, May 9, 2019 -- The Committee to Protect Journalists today condemned the Singapore parliament's passage of legislation that could be used to stifle reporting and the dissemination of news, and called for the punitive measure's immediate repeal....
Bangkok, April 2, 2019 -- The Committee to Protect Journalists called today on the Singapore parliament to reject legislation that would force online platforms to take down or amend news or information authorities deem as false....
Singapore draft law aims to censor reporting on terror attacks
February 28, 2018 10:23 AM ET
Bangkok, February 28, 2018--Draft anti-terrorism legislation under consideration in Singapore would imperil press freedom by banning journalists from covering terror attacks, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today....
Proposed law on contempt of court threatens press freedom in Singapore
August 5, 2016 1:59 PM ET
Bangkok, August 5, 2016 - Singaporean lawmakers should scrap proposed legislation on what constitutes contempt of court in news reporting and public commentary, the Committee to Protect Journalists said today. The draft law's penalties for violations, including possible prison terms for criticizing the judiciary, threaten to entrench more self-censorship...