The Leveson inquiry, begun in 2011 after revelations of phone-hacking and other ethical lapses by the press, drew to a close with the issuance of a lengthy report that proposed the creation of an independent regulatory body backed by statute. Critics, including CPJ, warned that statutory regulation would infringe on press freedom; Prime Minister David Cameron urged instead that the industry strengthen self-regulation. Some progress was made toward the reform of libel laws, which are highly unfavorable to journalists because they allow for “libel tourism,” the practice of filing claims based on minimum circulation within the United Kingdom even when plaintiffs and defendants are not based there. Libel legislation introduced in May would limit long and costly proceedings and make it easier for frivolous cases to be quickly dismissed. Press freedom advocates said such reform would be an important step forward, but urged lawmakers to strengthen public-interest defense and protect Internet service providers. The measure was pending in the House of Lords in late year. In June, the Home Office proposed a measure to increase government surveillance of all online communications. The proposal met with strong criticism--detractors called it the “snooper’s charter”--and a Parliamentary review committee dismissed it as excessive. The government sought to allow Sweden to extradite Julian Assange for questioning in an alleged assault, prompting the WikiLeaks founder to take refuge in the Ecuadoran Embassy in London. One journalist in Belfast was threatened in 2012, and the 11-year-old murder of Irish reporter Martin O’Hagen remained unsolved.
The Leveson report, released in November, immediately set off intense debate on where the line should be drawn between protecting victims of unethical press practices and ensuring the independence of news media.
|Leveson called for legislation that would establish the requirements of the new regulatory body, and identify a government agency that would “certify” its ongoing work.|
|Members of Parliament would lay out the criteria for the new regulatory entity and the means of selecting its members. Legislation, once in place, could be toughened.|
|CPJ has documented numerous instances worldwide in which government officials have abused regulatory bodies to further their own interests. The creation of a press regulator in the United Kingdom, one of the world’s most open societies, would set a poor precedent.|
A long-awaited defamation bill was introduced in 2012, raising hopes that plaintiff-friendly laws would be amended to curtail libel tourism and protect public-interest journalism. Under the bill, plaintiffs would have to prove they have suffered serious harm to their reputations. Press advocates welcomed the bill, which was pending in the House of Lords in late year, but said more could be done to protect public-interest journalism.
The murder of Martin O'Hagan, an investigative journalist with the Dublin newspaper Sunday World, remains unsolved. Known for his coverage of both Catholic and Protestant paramilitary groups, O'Hagan was shot outside his home in the Northern Ireland town of Lurgan on September 28, 2001.
The United Kingdom hosts at least 13 exiled journalists, according to CPJ research, making it one of the leading resettlement locations.
Do you believe the free flow of information must be protected? Sign the #RightToReport petition and demand that President Obama immediately:
1. Issue a presidential policy directive prohibiting the hacking and surveillance of journalists and media organizations.
2. Limit aggressive prosecutions that ensnare journalists and intimidate whistleblowers.
3. Prevent the harassment of journalists at the U.S. border.
Or click here to see the full petition, and join leading journalists like Christiane Amanpour, The Guardian’s Alan Rusbridger, Editor of the AP Kathleen Carroll, and Arianna Huffington in signing on.