India elections 2024: Journalist safety guide

A paramilitary soldier stands guard as people queue outside a polling station to cast their vote in West Bengal's 'Panchayat' or local elections, on the outskirts of Kolkata on July 8, 2023. (AFP/Dibyangshu Sarkar)

In 2024, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is seeking re-election for a third consecutive five-year term. The upcoming general elections in April 2024 will see India’s vast electorate, consisting of over 600 million people, exercising their right to vote.

CPJ’s Emergencies Response Team (ERT) has compiled a safety guide for journalists covering India’s election. The guide contains information for editors, reporters, and photojournalists on how to prepare for the election and how to mitigate digital, physical, and psychological risks.

During the past several years in India, there have been instances of increased pressure on journalists, censorship attempts, and limitations on reporting, especially when sensitive political issues are involved. Based on the last general election trends and over the last five years, data from the Armed Conflict & Location Event Data Project (ACLED) reveals that there is an increasing threat to journalists from physical attacks, mob violence, and violent demonstrations. At the same time, journalists are being forced to defend themselves on the digital front with an escalation in social media trolling, online harassment, cyberbullying, and digital surveillance. As a result of these combined assaults, newsrooms and the media as a whole are also experiencing mental health stress.  

Source: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED); www.acleddata.com

The ACLED dataset is an event-based dataset containing disaggregated incident information on political violence, demonstrations, and select related non-violent developments around the world. ACLED data are collected in real-time and published on a weekly basis. ACLED data detail the event type, involved actors, location, date, and other characteristics of these incidents. For more detailed information on ACLED methodology, please refer to the ACLED Codebook.

Background explainer on data visualization, from Kunal Majumder

Source: Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED); www.acleddata.com

The ACLED data highlights a surge in physical violence leading up to the 2019 general elections, particularly in West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Punjab, and Jammu and Kashmir. Concurrently, CPJ documentation and media reports from that period indicate a rise in physical assaults and threats against journalists.

For instance, in February 2019, alleged Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) supporters assaulted a journalist in Chhattisgarh for recording a scuffle between party workers. In April 2019, purported Indian National Congress supporters attacked a photojournalist in Tamil Nadu for photographing empty chairs at a Congress election rally.

West Bengal experienced an alarming number of incidents, including violence against journalists, documented by CPJ on May 6, 2019. Confrontations between supporters of the ruling All India Trinamool Congress and the opposition BJP in Kolkata resulted in violent clashes in Barrackpore. Journalists covering these events faced serious threats, including instances of stone pelting at their vehicles. Unfortunately, such targeted attacks were not isolated incidents; on the same day in the Hooghly district of West Bengal, political clashes again led to journalists being targeted while reporting on the events.

These incidents underscore a recurring pattern wherein journalists become casualties of political violence, compromising their ability to report objectively and freely.

Subsequent years have seen an escalation of physical violence in other Indian states, including Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka, and Manipur, according to ACLED data. CPJ documentation since May 2019 also reveals a consistent rise in violence against journalists in these states. Out of the 11 journalists killed since 2019, four were killed in Uttar Pradesh. In December 2020, an angry mob in Karnataka’s Hassan district attacked a woman journalist after she reported the existence of illegal cow slaughterhouses in the area. In September 2021, a journalist was assaulted by right-wing protesters in Mysuru, Karnataka, for recording their speech. 

The evolving nature of these press-related attacks necessitates heightened attention and proactive measures to safeguard journalistic integrity and ensure the free flow of information, particularly in politically charged environments.

Safety Guide Contents

Editor’s Safety Checklist when deploying staff on a hostile story

During the run-up to the election, editors and newsrooms will be assigning journalists to stories on short notice. This checklist includes key questions and steps to consider to reduce risk for staff.

For more information about risk assessment and planning, see the CPJ Resource Center.

Digital Safety: The basics

It’s important to know the basics of digital safety in order to be more secure both online and when using devices. The following are good best practices for journalists covering the election:

Secure your accounts
Better protection against phishing

Read the CPJ’s digital safety kit for more detailed information.

Police and media gather outside the residence of India’s main opposition Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi after he was disqualified by India’s parliament on Friday as a lawmaker, in New Delhi, India, March 24, 2023. REUTERS/Anushree Fadnavis

Digital Safety: Basic device preparedness

While covering an election, journalists are likely to be using their mobile phones for reporting and filing stories as well as being in contact with colleagues and sources. This has digital security implications if journalists are detained, and their phones are seized or broken. Raids on newsroom offices may also occur, during which devices, including computers, may be seized.

To better protect yourself:

Digital Safety: Spyware and digital surveillance

Coordinated spyware campaigns, including Pegasus, allegedly have been used against journalists in India, according to research by Citizen Lab and CPJ interviews. Once installed on your phone, sophisticated spyware will monitor all activity, including encrypted messages. Israel-based NSO Group says it markets Pegasus as a surveillance tool only to governments for law enforcement purposes, and has repeatedly told CPJ that it investigates reports that its products were misused in breach of contract.

Take steps to better protect your devices by:

If you suspect that you have spyware on your device:

Read more about Pegasus spyware in our advisory.

Digital Safety: Internet shutdowns

Complete or partial internet shutdowns are likely to increase during the election period and have serious consequences for journalists trying to do their jobs. Turning off or limiting access to the internet means journalists are unable to contact sources, fact-check data, or file stories. Complete or partial internet shutdowns in India and their effect on the media have been documented by CPJ.

Take the following steps to try and limit the effects of a shutdown:

For more detailed information on internet shutdowns, read CPJ’s guide.

A villager takes pictures from a mobile phone next to Indian army soldiers during the funeral of an Indian army soldier Waseem Ahmad, in Bandipora on August 6, 2023. Tauseef MUSTAFA / AFP

Digital Safety: Online harassment and targeted online campaigns

Online harassment, including targeted online campaigns, can increase during elections. Media workers are often targeted by online attackers who want to discredit the journalist and their work. This can often involve coordinated harassment and misinformation campaigns that leave the journalist unable to use social media, essentially forcing them offline. Women journalists are particularly targeted and are exposed to misogynistic and violent sexual harassment online. CPJ has documented several cases of women journalists in India being subjected to this type of harassment. Protecting against online attacks is not easy. However, there are steps that journalists can take to better protect themselves and their accounts.

To better protect yourself:

During an attack:

For more detailed information on protecting yourself against online harassment read CPJ’s resources for protecting against online abuse.

Physical Safety: reporting safely on rallies and protests

During elections, journalists frequently work amongst crowds at rallies, campaign events, live broadcasts, and protests.

To minimize the risk:

Political Events and Rallies
Protests

To minimize the risk when covering protests:

To minimize the risk when dealing with tear gas:

Journalists have been assaulted by protesters in India. When dealing with aggression, consider the following:

Physical Safety: reporting safely in a hostile community

Journalists are frequently required to report in areas or communities that are hostile to the media or outsiders. This can happen if a community perceives that the media does not fairly represent them or portrays them in a negative light. During an election campaign, journalists may be required to work for extended periods among communities that are hostile to the media.

To help reduce the risk:

  • Park your vehicle ready to go, ideally with the driver in the vehicle. 
  • If you have to work remotely from your transportation, know how to get back to it. Identify landmarks and share this information with colleagues. 
  • Know where to go in case of a medical emergency and work out an exit strategy.
Residents from Meitei community stop an army vehicle from moving towards a gunfight site after a fresh clash between members of rival ethnic groups, in Imphal, Manipur, India, November 7, 2023. REUTERS/Stringer

Psychological Safety: Managing trauma in the newsroom

Stories and situations that frequently result in distress and when you should be thinking about trauma include:

Management should guide staff on such days and share the responsibility of care. The following approach should be considered and acted upon if required. The extent to which the guidance is implemented will depend on the severity of the story.

On such days:

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been increasingly acknowledged as an issue confronting journalists who cover distressing stories.  

Traditionally, the issue is associated with journalists and media workers in conflict zones or when they are exposed to near-death or highly threatening situations. However, more recently, there is a greater awareness that journalists working on any sort of distressing story can experience symptoms of PTSD. Stories involving abuse or violence (crime scene reporting, criminal court cases, or robberies) or stories that involve a large loss of life (car crashes/mine collapses) are all potential causes of trauma among those covering them. Those being abused online or trolled are also vulnerable to stress-related trauma.

The growth of uncensored user-generated material has created a digital front line. It is now recognized that journalists and editors viewing traumatic imagery of death and horror are susceptible to trauma. This secondary trauma is now known as vicarious trauma. 

It is important for all journalists to realize that suffering from stress after witnessing horrific incidents/footage is a normal human reaction. It is not a weakness. 

For everyone:

For editing producers:

For producers in the field:

If it’s particularly intense:

Journalists requiring assistance can contact CPJ Emergencies via emergencies@cpj.org or CPJ’s India Representative Kunal Majumder at kmajumder@cpj.org. For more information on journalist safety during elections visit Journalist Safety: Elections.

Exit mobile version