Turkish police hold 3 journalists for 3 days on suspicion of ‘financing terrorism’

Turkish riot police stand guard in Diyarbakir during a gathering of Turkish Kurds for Newroz, a celebration marking the first day of spring, in March 2022. (Photo: AFP/Ilyas Akengin)

Istanbul, March 1, 2024—Police raided the homes of three Kurdish journalists and detained them for three days in a February incident that appears to be part of an ongoing trend of systemic harassment by Turkish authorities. Several journalists working for pro-Kurdish outlets have been arrested over the past 12 months including journalists Dicle Müftüoğlu and Sedat Yılmaz, who were charged separately with terrorism offenses, using their journalistic activities as evidence.

The Committee to Protect Journalists on Friday called on Turkish authorities to stop harassing the members of the Kurdish media with pointless arrests and trials and allow them to work freely.

“Turkish police took journalists Oktay Candemir, Arif Aslan, and Lokman Gezgin from their homes as if they were dangerous criminals and forced them to needlessly spend days being questioned about their professional work. This is not an isolated incident in Turkey,” said Özgür Öğret, CPJ’s Turkey representative. “If Turkish authorities care to improve the country’s press freedom record, they must stop the systematic harassment of the critical Kurdish journalists with pointless judicial action that equates reporting to terrorism.”

The February incidents in Turkey include:

Another Diyarbakır court on Thursday acquitted Yılmaz, another editor for Mezopotamya, of terrorism charges. Yılmaz was released pending trial on December 14, 2023.

Candemir was detained and charged with “insulting” a deceased sultan in September 2020; the case was dropped in 2021.

CPJ emailed the chief prosecutor’s office in Van and Diyarbakır for comment but did not receive a reply.

Turkey recently dropped to 10th place as one of the world’s worst jailers of journalists, but that decline does not signal an improvement, according to press freedom experts.

Exit mobile version