|
New York, May 31, 2002—A three-judge appeals panel yesterday
sentenced two men to a 13-year prison term for the 1998 murder of Philip
True, a Mexico City correspondent for the San Antonio Express-News.
The unanimous ruling overturned an August 2001 verdict that had acquitted
the two men.
The men were found guilty of "intentional homicide," the San Antonio
Express-News reported. The prosecution had sought a conviction on
charges of "premeditated murder," which carries a sentence of up to
20 years. The defendants remain free while their lawyers consider whether
to file a final appeal before a federal court.
On August 3, Colotlán municipal judge José Luis Reyes
Contreras acquitted Juan Chivarra de la Cruz and his brother-in-law
Miguel Hernández de la Cruz, who in December 1998 were charged
with True's murder. The Jalisco State Attorney General's Office appealed
the acquittals in a September 25 hearing before the panel of three judges
from the Jalisco State Supreme Court of Justice.
Today's guilty verdict comes a month after Martha True, the journalist's
widow, filed a petition requesting that the appeals panel issue a quick
ruling on the case and explain why it was taking so long to reach a
decision. Normally, an appeals ruling in Mexico should be issued within
15 days of the hearing.
"We are relieved that after four years this process is nearing an end,
and that an appeals panel has unanimously confirmed the guilt of the
two suspects," said Ann Cooper, executive director of the Committee
to Protect Journalists (CPJ).
Body found in shallow grave
In late November 1998, the 50-year-old True embarked on a 10-day
trip to report on the Huichol Indians, an indigenous population that
lives in a mountainous area stretching across Nayarit, Jalisco, and
Durango states. The journalist was last seen alive on December 4 in
the village of Salmotita.
On December 16, after an intensive search by the Mexican military, True's
body was found in a shallow grave partially covered with rocks at the
bottom of a ravine. Neither his wedding ring nor his watch had been
taken, suggesting that robbery was not a motive.
On December 26, 1998, authorities arrested Chivarra and Hernández,
both Huichol Indians, who confessed to murdering True because he had
taken photographs without their permission. The journalist's belongings,
including his camera, binoculars, and backpack, were found at the suspects'
homes.
When the two men were brought into court, they acknowledged killing
True but claimed they had acted in self-defense. They also claimed that
their confession had been extracted under torture, which has been denied
by Jalisco State attorney general Gerardo Octavio Solís Gómez.
Both suspects have repeatedly given contradictory statements in interviews
with the San Antonio Express-News. While they initially contended
that they had never seen True, they later admitted to meeting him. Then
in an interview published on August 8, 2001, both men claimed they had
seen the journalist but never talked to him.
Differing forensic reports
Mexican authorities have issued three separate forensic reports
since True's body was found. The first, based on an autopsy by Jalisco
State medical examiners, found that True had been strangled with his
own bandana and had sustained a head injury that was not attributable
to a fall. The second report, based on an autopsy by the Federal Attorney
General's Office, concluded that True died from blows to his head and
body and from edema (accumulation of fluid in the lungs), most likely
after suffering an accidental fall caused by heavy drinking.
In March 2000, the third forensic report, which is required under Mexican
law when two autopsies yield different results, found that True's death
was caused by a pulmonary edema resulting from a head injury. This conclusion
was based solely on the examiner's analysis of the first two autopsy
reports.
Judge Reyes Contreras has been quoted as saying that his August 2001
decision to exonerate Chivarra and Hernández was based on the
second autopsy report, which concluded that True's death was accidental.
His ruling did not account for the fact that True's belongings were
found in the two suspects' homes or that his body was hidden in a grave
near the death site.
In the latest verdict, the three-judge panel dismissed the second autopsy
report because, despite the fact that this was a state case, federal
authorities had carried out the autopsy. Furthermore, because the body
had been so badly damaged in the first autopsy, the second report was
considered seriously flawed.

|