• Nation is a persistent jailer of journalists.
• Security agents enforce rigid censorship.
4: Years EU human rights sanctions were in place before being lifted in 2009.
President Islam Karimov’s authoritarian government held at least seven journalists in prison, retaining its notorious distinction as the region’s leading jailer of journalists. Authorities harassed independent journalists, blocked critical news Web sites, and retained their tight grip on traditional media. Lawyers who defended journalists found themselves the targets of state retaliation as the country’s judicial system grew more punitive. While authorities kept a stranglehold on free expression at home, Uzbek diplomats insisted that their country’s actions were consistent with democratic principles.
ATTACKS ON
THE PRESS: 2009
• Main Index
EUROPE and
CENTRAL ASIA
Regional Analysis:
•
Why a killing in Chechnya
is an international issue
Country Summaries
• Armenia
• Azerbaijan
• Belarus
• Croatia
• Georgia
• Kazakhstan
• Kyrgyzstan
• Russia
• Ukraine
• Uzbekistan
• Other developments
Karimov, who rose to
leadership in Uzbekistan under Soviet rule, marked two decades in power in
June. While proclaiming himself a democrat after the demise of the Soviet
Union, his policies have consistently reflected authoritarian traditions. His
regime has imprisoned its critics and forced them into exile, violated human
rights, and brought the country’s once-vibrant independent press to near
extinction.
Government figures show
more than 1,100 domestic media outlets. Although most are technically
independent from the state, agents with the Uzbek security service, known as
the SNB, censor print and broadcast reports before they reach the public, CPJ
research shows. In March, SNB representatives held a series of meetings with
Uzbek editors in the capital, Tashkent, to direct them to endorse government
polices and to avoid critical reporting, the independent regional news Web site
Voice of Freedom reported.
Topics such as corruption,
terrorism, religious extremism, the environment, health care, and women’s
rights are discussed on talk shows and news programs, but only at the
initiative and with the permission of the SNB, according to CPJ sources, all of
whom requested anonymity for fear of reprisal. Sources said news and talk shows
address topical issues in general terms only, and do not critically scrutinize
named officials. Critical coverage of Karimov and his family is forbidden. Fear
of losing a job, being exposed to harassment by SNB agents, or going to jail on
fabricated charges contribute to widespread self-censorship among local journalists,
sources told CPJ.
CPJ sources said
authorities continued to block critical and independent news Web sites inside
the country. A number of regional news Web sites—including Ferghana, Uznews, Centrasia, EurasiaNet, Voice
of Freedom, Lenta, Newsru, and those associated with the BBC Uzbek
Service, the U.S. government-funded Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and the
German public broadcaster Deutsche Welle—were inaccessible in Uzbekistan
throughout the year. Authorities also blocked online access to WordPress, the
blog publishing platform, those sources said.
In February, Samarkand
regional prosecutors arrested Dilmurod Saiid, a journalist and human rights
activist, on trumped-up charges of extortion and forgery, Ferghana reported. The journalist had written about corruption in
government agricultural programs and had helped the Tashkent-based rights group
Ezgulik defend farmers’ rights. Several witnesses recanted their statements
against Saiid, defense lawyer Ruhiddin Komilov said. But in a closed proceeding
in July—without a defense lawyer in attendance—Saiid was sentenced to 12 and a
half years in prison. During the proceedings, Komilov was stripped of his
license to practice law under a new and politicized regulatory process.
Based on a 2008 law
governing the practice of law, the government decreed in March that all lawyers
must pass a state exam and obtain membership in the newly formed,
state-controlled Chamber of Lawyers, Ferghana reported. The chamber effectively replaced the
Lawyers Association of Uzbekistan, an independent professional organization.
CPJ sources and press reports said that Komilov and Rustam Tulyaganov, both of
whom had defended independent journalists, lost their licenses after supposedly
failing the state-administered exam.
Uzbek authorities briefly
imprisoned two other journalists in 2009. In February, a court in eastern
Uzbekistan sentenced independent journalist Kushodbek Usmon to six months in
jail on criminal charges of defamation and insult after he published an article
critical of local police, Voice of
Freedom said. After his release
in July, Usmon told RFE/RL that he had been tortured in prison. In August,
Uzbek border guards detained Shukhrat Shodiyev, a Tajik reporter who had
contributed to the Dushanbe-based news agency Asia Plus and to Ferghana. Authorities took Shodiyev from a train after they found his
press card, Tajik-language newspapers, a copy of the Quran, and compact discs
with Chechen music, he later told Ferghana. He told Ferghana he was questioned at
length about his work as a journalist and the reasons for a trip he had just
taken to Chechnya. Shodiyev was freed in September as part of a presidential
amnesty.
Less fortunate were the
seven writers and editors still held when CPJ conducted its annual worldwide
census of imprisoned journalists on December 1. CPJ research shows that the
Karimov regime has been a persistent jailer of journalists throughout the
decade. In one case, authorities forced a freelance reporter—Dzhamshid Karimov,
the president’s nephew—into a psychiatric hospital without a court order or
medical diagnosis. Regional authorities snatched Karimov from the street in his
hometown of Jizzakh in September 2006, and continued to hold him in a ward in
Samarkand, sources told CPJ.
Despite this ongoing repression,
the European Union lifted an arms embargo imposed in 2005 after Uzbek
government troops killed hundreds of protesters in the eastern city of Andijan.
The EU said authorities had made some progress on human rights—releasing some
jailed political prisoners and introducing habeas corpus rights—but its October
decision appeared to be based largely on geopolitical realities. EU officials
apparently saw diminishing value in isolating the Karimov regime. Uzbekistan
has vast oil and gas reserves—and markets in Russia and China, where leaders
valued the natural resources more than Uzbekistan’s human rights record.
In talks with the EU,
Uzbek diplomats had aggressively defended their country’s policies, suggesting
that the constitution ensures human rights, RFE/RL reported. International
rights activists criticized the EU’s decision. “The EU has effectively
abandoned the cause of human rights in Uzbekistan,” Human Rights Watch said in
a statement.
No journalists were killed
in

Delicious
Digg
Google
Reddit
StumbleUpon


