• Ortega administration marginalizes private media.
0: Number of press conferences held by Ortega since taking office.
Three decades after a revolution swept the Sandinistas into power, the government of President Daniel Ortega still cast private media as enemies and moved forcefully to curtail their influence. Ortega—who led the 1979 uprising against the Somoza dictatorship and reclaimed the presidency in 2006 elections—employed a range of tactics to marginalize the press, including legal persecution, smear campaigns to discredit adversaries, and manipulation of state advertising to punish critical outlets.
ATTACKS ON
THE PRESS: 2009
• Main Index
AMERICAS
Regional Analysis:
• In the Americas,
Big Brother is watching reporters
Country Summaries
• Argentina
• Brazil
• Colombia
• Cuba
• Ecuador
• Honduras
• Mexico
• Nicaragua
• United States
• Venezuela
• Other developments
The administration ignored
private media outlets and disparaged their work. Local reporters had no access
to Ortega or his close advisers, and were often excluded from government
events. Ortega himself remained an elusive figure: His agenda was a political
mystery and his health a state secret, although reports widely speculated that
the president had lupus, a chronic autoimmune disease. The Sandinista leader
had not given a press conference since he took office in early 2007.
First Lady Rosario
Murillo, a virtual prime minister who manages all of the government’s
communications, exerted strict control over Ortega’s agenda. Officials in the executive branch were allowed to talk to the press only with her
permission. Except for contact with a few pro-government outlets controlled by
the president’s family or the Sandinista National Liberation Front (FSLN)
party, the Nicaraguan leader kept himself out of the public eye. Officials said
that his isolation from public scrutiny sought to ensure that the administration’s views
reached the public “uncontaminated” by critical media.
The government was not
interested in communicating with the Nicaraguan people through the media, Human
Rights Ombudsman Omar Cabezas told CPJ during a visit in April. “We establish
our own agenda: We talk when we want, to say what we want,” said Nicaragua’s
top human rights official.
CPJ documented the president’s aggressive stance toward the press
in a July special report. In the report, “Daniel Ortega’s Media War,” CPJ urged
the administration to ensure that the media receive equitable access and
treatment; that it halt legal harassment and smear efforts; and that it end the
use of inflammatory anti-press language. Ortega’s animosity toward the press,
CPJ found, was driven by decades-old resentment with roots in the first
Sandinista government.
Supporters of Ortega took issue with CPJ’s findings. Roberto
Larios Meléndez, president of the Union of Nicaraguan Journalists, said the report
“looked like a document written by the [U.S.] State Department in the 1980s,”
and called it part of the “low-intensity war that the Nicaraguan far-right is
fighting to oust the government with the support of international
organizations.” Larios’ criticism echoed rhetoric used by Ortega to vilify
press critics as either CIA sponsored or oligarchy controlled. Larios did not
dispute the factual elements of CPJ’s report.
An April report by the Media Observatory at the Center for Media
Investigations (CINCO), a nonprofit that promotes media research, also found
that the administration pursued an adversarial media agenda. “Ortega is living
a revolution déjà vu: Thirty years after the FSLN victory the enemy is still
the same,” wrote the report’s author, Eduardo Marenco. The Sandinista leader
himself used similar language in a March interview with Al-Jazeera English,
saying that Nicaragua is fighting “a media war, a war of ideas.”
The government used the
official media apparatus—composed of Channel 4 television, Nueva Radio Ya, and
the news Web site El 19—to launch character attacks against critics in
the media, CPJ research showed. In March, for example, Channel 4 aired a series
of ads attacking the director of the Managua-based daily El Nuevo Diario, Francisco Chamorro, and its news editor, Danilo Aguirre, as
“fascists.” The paper’s dismissal of reporter Eloisa Ibarra became pretext for
a smear campaign that included a photo montage linking Chamorro and Aguirre to
Nazi swastikas. Ibarra said she was fired for union activism; El Nuevo Diario said it was over her performance.
The most egregious example
of government intimidation was aimed at Carlos Fernando Chamorro, former editor
of the Sandinista magazine Barricada in the 1980s, who now runs the magazine Confidencial, serves as president of CINCO, and hosts the television news
programs “Esta Semana” (This Week) and “Esta Noche” (This Night). Chamorro is
one of the most critical and best-known journalists in the country. It was on
“Esta Semana” that Chamorro exposed a multimillion-dollar extortion scheme
involving the Sandinista Party and influence peddling in the judiciary.
After the story aired in
2007, Channel 4 and Nueva Radio Ya broadcast unfounded ads connecting Chamorro
to international drug trafficking. The government intensified its attack in
September 2008, launching an inquiry into whether CINCO and other nonprofits
were illegally funneling foreign investments to other civil society groups.
CINCO’s Managua offices were raided and Chamorro was interrogated.
In February 2009, after an
international outcry, the Attorney General’s office dropped the criminal case
against CINCO and the other organizations. Chamorro credited international
attention for the government’s decision to drop the matter. “Thanks to this
wave of national and international solidarity, this case set a precedent: When
citizens are right and express the truth, especially when they are driven to
resist and not to be intimidated, sooner or later the government will have to
take a step back,” he wrote in Confidencial.
Private media executives
complained about a biased system of distributing government advertising that
effectively punished critical outlets while rewarding supportive press. The
Sandinista government spent 80 percent of its US$3.5 million advertising budget
in 2007-08 for spots on Channel 4, which is run by Ortega’s sons, according to Confidencial. Administration officials said they were following practices
established by their predecessors. Preceding governments, for example, had
boycotted Sandinista media, human rights ombudsman Cabezas argued.
In September, Nicaraguan
authorities organized a forum for FSLN-affiliated journalists that, among other
things, proclaimed mainstream media—including television channels 2, 8, 10, and
12, as well as the dailies La Prensa, and El
Nuevo Diario—to be “enemies” of the
Ortega government. A bill before Congress would require all journalists to have
authorization from a Sandinista journalist group, the Nicaraguan Journalists
Association, to work in any media. The bill sparked immediate opposition from
independent journalists who said it was an obvious attempt to regulate the
profession. The bill was pending in late year.
In October, the
Supreme Court overturned constitutional prohibitions on consecutive
presidential re-election and service of more than two terms, clearing the way
for Ortega to run again in 2011. The opposition and the private press harshly
criticized the ruling. El Nuevo Diario described the decision as a “legal obscenity” and said it was “an
assault against the social peace” in Nicaragua. In an editorial, La Prensa said that the
Supreme Court’s decision was an “absurd and grotesque” attack against the
constitution.

Delicious
Digg
Google
Reddit
StumbleUpon


